Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0241648, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33270629

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Food allergy is documented to result in considerable morbidity, negative impact on quality of life, and substantial medical care costs. Although anecdotal data suggest widely varying practices in the diagnosis and management of food allergies, the diversity and relative frequency of these practices have not been documented. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed evaluating allergists' management approaches of individuals with peanut allergy (PA) in Germany (DE), France (FR), and the United Kingdom (UK). RESULTS: Here, we report the survey results from a total of 109 allergists from DE, FR and the UK. They reported to confirm PA at initial diagnosis using skin prick test (≥60%), while allergists from DE and FR reported using allergen-specific IgE testing more (>86%) compared to the UK (<50%). At initial diagnosis, oral food challenge was used less in DE (13%) and FR (14%) and very rarely in the UK (3%) to confirm diagnosis. Recognition of acute reactions, use of adrenaline auto-injectors and allergen avoidance were reported to be discussed with the patient/caregiver at the initial office visit by most allergists (>75%). Half of the responders reported assessing the patient's quality of life. 63% allergists reported retesting for PA resolution at a later date, with 45% allergists indicated to recommend ingestion of a normal serving of peanut regularly upon resolution. Lack of effective PA treatment was reported to be a 'very significant' barrier for optimal PA treatment, with allergists being less than 'moderately familiar' with data from clinical trials testing new treatments options for PA. Lastly, allergists stated that the severity of patient's PA ranked as the most important factor in their decision to recommend oral immunotherapy for PA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides essential insights into the practice of allergists and highlights some areas that would inform strategies for education and improving PA healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Arachis/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/epidemiología , Adolescente , Alérgenos/inmunología , Alergólogos/psicología , Arachis/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/sangre , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/patología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
Allergy ; 75(7): 1546-1554, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32329930
5.
Allergy ; 74(6): 1052-1062, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637768

RESUMEN

An accurate diagnosis of ß-lactam (BL) allergy can reduce patient morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to investigate the availability of BL reagents, their use and test procedures in different parts of Europe, as well as any differences in the diagnostic workups for evaluating subjects with BL hypersensitivity. A survey was emailed to all members of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) between February and April 2016, and the questionnaire was meant to study the management of suspected BL hypersensitivity. The questionnaire was emailed to 82 DAIG centres and answered by 57. Amoxicillin alone or combined to clavulanic acid were the most commonly involved BL except in the Danish centre, where penicillin V was the most frequently suspected BL. All centres performed an allergy workup in subjects with histories of hypersensitivity to BL: 53 centres (93%) followed DAIG guidelines, two national guidelines and two local guidelines. However, there were deviations from DAIG recommendations concerning allergy tests, especially drug provocation tests. A significant heterogeneity exists in current practice not only among countries, but also among centres within the same country. This suggests the need to re-evaluate, update and standardize protocols on the management of patients with suspected BL allergy.


Asunto(s)
Alergólogos/psicología , Antibacterianos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , beta-Lactamas/inmunología , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/sangre , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pruebas de Provocación Nasal , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...